Home
The Concept
The Mentors
The Thesis
The Student
Contact

 

The Concept

Strategic Culture Blog

The Beginning:

        It has taken a while to get to where I believe that I can start this process.  I mean I think I can actually begin to see the light at the end of the tunnel that marks the start of the research so to speak.  It really is wonderful when you find that the academics advising you and teaching you, though they may not quite understand what you're going on about, are justified in their faith in the learning process.  As you work your way through the layers of learning that seem irrelevant to where you THINK you want to go, you begin, often as a direct or indirect result, to get a clearer vision of the complex path that may actually get you there.  In any event, I believe I can see a few of the puzzle pieces actually beginning to fit together. 

        I will have to draw on many different ideas and disciplines such as psychology, anthropology, geography, history and political science, but that's much of the fascination of it all.  I think that I will draw on Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, but try to apply them to the development of the nation/state.  It should work and I find it quite an insightful assessment of individual development so see no reason not to take it to the state level.  Once a state is physically and psychologically secure does it not begin to self identify and eventually (hopefully) to self-actualize?  Is the development of the collective really all that different than the individual?

        I also need to explore strategic geography as well as locale specific geography/topography to see how they contribute to or obstruct both local and inter regional transportation and communication or competition versus cooperation.  And how does a country portray itself both currently and historically in the maps and charts it produces?  (Self perception is a fascinating indicator of many things).  It's a question of identifying what shapes and defines the sense of physicality that evolves around any given state and the accumulated layers of associated core values that influence perception and response to threats and opportunities.  Sometimes these layers conflict and sometimes they reinforce (colonialism and post-colonialism?).  Why?  And what does that mean over time?

        The MA is supposed to come up with a definition of Strategic Culture and I now see this as quite achievable, especially if I put it in context with concepts such as political culture and strategic geography.  Tackling the impact of geography on the political culture of Afghanistan for a directed studies course this spring will also be a useful stepping stone not just to a definition of strategic culture, but to the beginnings of later research.  It will help me begin to understand those key elements that define any given strategic culture.  I hope, through this process,  to come up with a rudimentary framework for a Strategic Culture of the tribes in the Afghan region.  Concurrent activity, to borrow from the military, will be to apply those same elements first to my self, and through the combination try to develop a set of queries for a later extended study of the Strategic Culture of Canada.  I already have a few ideas about the results of that one!  But this learning path keeps surprising me, so I am content to leave myself open to whatever comes.

        In terms of  Canada, I have a wonderful idea that I hope to pursue with a couple of able colleagues.  I want to prepare a study, with carefully planned questions and a matrix of sorts for compiling the answers, and head back and forth across Canada, as a team, to simply talk to people.  We will go first by bus, then by train, then by car.  We will ask the questions, record the answers, take lots of pictures - even publish the questionnaire, perhaps in a magazine or through the CBC before we go.  Who knows?  Just gather grass roots feedback in an informal setting - to see if we can actually identify a Canadian Strategic Culture.  From there I will have a starting point to what I really want to do - which is to develop a reasonably reliable process for Comparative Strategic Culture Analysis.  If I can do this, I see it becoming a useful analytic and predictive tool for international relations, more effective conflict resolution, a well as enhanced and better understood peace building and peacemaking. I wonder if the Canadian Forces will give me a year off for directed advanced study?  Hmmm.

Survey Project Idea

Comparative Strategic Culture is a term or expression that has been around conceptually for some time, but has gained in interest since the seventies.  Its origins lie in the field of Cultural Anthropology, but as a specific study it needs to look beyond socio-cultural understanding to the building of a predictive capability with regards to a specific culture's strategic profile.

One of the dilemmas facing this emerging discipline is the absence of consensus on a definition.  Multiple conversations on the subject would lead me to concur, but also to suggest that the challenge is not the overall concept, but the term "culture".  I would have to argue at this point in my thinking and reading, that it is imperative in an understanding of this concept to define culture, whether it is individual, organizational or national, in a strategic context.  There are many aspects of a culture that have a direct bearing on perceptions of threat or opportunity.  In my thinking thus far, these would make up the elements of strategic culture.  The key is to isolate the strategically relevant elements from the encompassing range of historically and socially enlightening cultural elements.

Can I create a definition that will achieve a modicum of consensus?  Will anyone even read it?  And if they either don't read my definition or don't feed back on it, how will I know if I have achieved consensus?  Will I care?  From the perspective of my own strategic culture, while I realize that am inclined to want to serve the greater good, I know that I am equally disposed to pursue a thing simply because it interests me and I see value in achieving a better understanding.

 

Strategic [strat-ee-jik]  Adjective

 

1. planned to achieve an advantage; tactical

2. (of weapons, esp. missiles) directed against an enemy's homeland rather than used on a battlefield

strategically adv

 

Collins Essential English Dictionary 2nd Edition 2006 © HarperCollins Publishers 2004, 2006

 

Cul·ture  (klchr) n.

 

1.

a. The totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought.

b. These patterns, traits, and products considered as the expression of a particular period, class, community, or population: Edwardian culture; Japanese culture; the culture of poverty.

c. These patterns, traits, and products considered with respect to a particular category, such as a field, subject, or mode of expression: religious culture in the Middle Ages; musical culture; oral culture.

d. The predominating attitudes and behavior that characterize the functioning of a group or organization.

2. Intellectual and artistic activity and the works produced by it.

3.

a. Development of the intellect through training or education.

b. Enlightenment resulting from such training or education.

4. A high degree of taste and refinement formed by aesthetic and intellectual training.

5. Special training and development: voice culture for singers and actors.

6. The cultivation of soil; tillage.

7. The breeding of animals or growing of plants, especially to produce improved stock.

8. Biology

a. The growing of microorganisms, tissue cells, or other living matter in a specially prepared nutrient medium.

b. Such a growth or colony, as of bacteria.

tr.v. cul·tured, cul·tur·ing, cul·tures

1. To cultivate.

 

[Middle English, cultivation, from Old French, from Latin cultra, from cultus, past participle of colere; see cultivate.]

 

Usage Note: The application of the term culture to the collective attitudes and behavior of corporations arose in business jargon during the late 1980s and early 1990s. Unlike many locutions that emerge in business jargon, it spread to popular use in newspapers and magazines. Few Usage Panelists object to it. Over 80 percent of Panelists accept the sentence The new management style is a reversal of GE's traditional corporate culture, in which virtually everything the company does is measured in some form and filed away somewhere. · Ever since C.P. Snow wrote of the gap between "the two cultures" (the humanities and science) in the 1950s, the notion that culture can refer to smaller segments of society has seemed implicit. Its usage in the corporate world may also have been facilitated by increased awareness of the importance of genuine cultural differences in a global economy, as between Americans and the Japanese, that have a broad effect on business practices.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2003. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

culture  Noun

1. the ideas, customs, and art of a particular society

2. a particular civilization at a particular period

3. a developed understanding of the arts

4. development or improvement by special attention or training: physical culture

5. the cultivation and rearing of plants or animals

6. a growth of bacteria for study

Verb

[-turing, -tured]

to grow (bacteria) in a special medium [Latin colere to till]

cultural adj

Collins Essential English Dictionary 2nd Edition 2006 © HarperCollins Publishers 2004, 2006